Ill share a photo, it will look coolIt looks sexier with the PR Coils exposed,don't cover of them up
Ill share a photo, it will look coolIt looks sexier with the PR Coils exposed,don't cover of them up
Chris, that doesn't make sense. Because your 2nd diagram is using the VTT Valve Cover with a -10AN fitting to the high side. There isn't any cyclonic stuff there, and there's no valve or orifice to limit the flow. So @jyamona would be correct, the crankcase would never see vacuum at all with that design.
Also that second can being VTA is totally not required because you also have the oil cap breather there. And that breather *does* have the check valve. So if you used the low side as you have designed with the breather cap that has the check valve you would have the simplest PCV setup imaginable that should work in all situations.
EDIT - I know Tony mentioned it in the video, but the oil cap breather is the most interesting thing to date. With the baffles and the one way check valve inside of it you have really nailed a great design there that allows you/me/the community to simplify the PCV setup considerably.
Judging from those logs , 30whpThis isn't a stock motor any more. I wouldn't use that as any more than a foot note or item of interest. Who knows where they even measured that.
The simple answer though, is that if someone wants more vacuum than we're recommending then yes, add a check valve as was previously postulated. The system is designed to have a ton of flexibility in it and is easily adaptable!
We have 5/8" check valves for -10 hose, and one piece -10ORB to -10AN check valves. We do aim to please. Hell, we even have some breather logs to share:
View attachment 12448
Good post. This is the kind of thing I was thinking of. What configuration(s) for what purpose(s)? Lots of folks running around with a bms occ and RB PCV check valve.Im trying to figure out whats the simplest,effective yet correct setup to go by.For instance.i have a bms occ for high side vta.I have a RB PCV checkvalve on low side in valve cover.I want to avoid carbon build up on my valves as best as possible.So would a setup of valve cover breather,running with out RB pcv valve running staight to a catchcan using VTT External PCV Adapter fitting do the trick?
We have a new site coming that will address the shipping issues. In the meantime, choose domestic for whatever the item with highest shipping is and then just choose local pickup for the other items and we’ll box them together. We’ll take care of you.
Chris
Have to back off on this bc some of you gems are just selecting “local pick up” when you live in East Africa and are thinking you found a top-secret yet authorized way to save a few bucks. Negative. You gonna get yo order cancelled.
If you’re putting together multiple small pieces send an email to [email protected] and we’ll cut you some slack.
Xoxo
Chris
Great question. I did the same thing as you, running both currently.^ That’s a good one!
So now Im getting twisted in my underwear...
I’ve got a BMS occ - that’s on the high side iirc. I just purchased the vented, check balled oil cap. That is also for the high side.
Q1: Okay to run both?
Q2: Tell me what to buy for the low side.
What sort of data would you like to compare? I can get a log today for you
This is exactly my question. With the VTT oil cap don’t we just need the low side OCC? And if I’m not mistaken the PCV stock check valve on the high side should not be removed to ensure vacuum in the crankcase when required, which should also address @jyamona ‘s questions.Also that second can being VTA is totally not required because you also have the oil cap breather there. And that breather *does* have the check valve. So if you used the low side as you have designed with the breather cap that has the check valve you would have the simplest PCV setup imaginable that should work in all situations.
This is exactly my question. With the VTT oil cap don’t we just need the low side OCC? And if I’m not mistaken the PCV stock check valve on the high side should not be removed to ensure vacuum in the crankcase when required, which should also address @jyamona ‘s questions.