Report; mount insert is great!
First startup and minor portion of initial idle has some minor vibration but otherwise the car feels fantastic. I love the little bit of vibration increase and otherwise plush feeling when accelerating. Bravo.
It sure seems like the 'iS mount is better. I've tried to move the mount by hand and don't feel a collapsed feeling. The new mounts next to each other are quite a stark difference both in density and amount of rubber around the top 'bolt'. Price seems to be reducing but paying the $300 like I did can pay for a lot of cheaper mounts.
18 ft/lb is what I went with for bottom bolts. I agree with TIS... Bently might have a typo or I found the wrong specs. No worries.
First startup and minor portion of initial idle has some minor vibration but otherwise the car feels fantastic. I love the little bit of vibration increase and otherwise plush feeling when accelerating. Bravo.
Honestly I'm stunned that you had a passenger motor mount last 100k miles. The iS mount is really that much better? My standard mount was crushed in less than 30k miles.
I believe on the motor mounts, there are two different torque specs, depending whether upper or lower fastener. From the TIS: 28nm (20 ft lbs) and 68nm (50 ft lbs). Smaller bolt is bottom side at 28nm. Don't know if the iS is different.
Filippo
It sure seems like the 'iS mount is better. I've tried to move the mount by hand and don't feel a collapsed feeling. The new mounts next to each other are quite a stark difference both in density and amount of rubber around the top 'bolt'. Price seems to be reducing but paying the $300 like I did can pay for a lot of cheaper mounts.
18 ft/lb is what I went with for bottom bolts. I agree with TIS... Bently might have a typo or I found the wrong specs. No worries.