Hey Chris, what do I buy for the N55 m2? The driver side and passenger side motor mounts are different with only one mount being shared with the s55 and the other being an unshared part number with any bmw.
Thanks for your reply! I guess keep us m2 owners posted when you figure that out so we can grab a set!Well, the S55 series will fit at least the one mount. We're not sure about the other side since it isn't cross-referenced to anything and we haven't checked that one specifically.
Chris
8Just curious why you'd run driver side only? I took measurements on stock motor mounts on my car around 30k miles (most of those at stock HP) and the passenger side mount was collapsed - total junk. The driver side motor mount looked pretty good. The problem child is on the compression side of the motor. And if you are running the $10,000,000 iS mount then I'd be concerned about not having to spend $10,000,000 each time that mount takes a crap. In the N54 case, whether you know it or not (i.e. take your factory mounts out and measure them), the passenger-side mount is getting destroyed. I suspect it is a fatigue failure caused by rate of change and/or extent of compression and extension. Seems like these would limit those factors.
I'm guessing the inserts may limit compression and expansion material abuse and prolong the life of the motor mounts. If you are running stock Corteco mounts, they are cheap and who cares (that is, buy them primarily for performance reasons). But if you are running the cubic zirconia iS mounts, getting longevity out of your depreciating asset might be a bigger reason for considering this setup. Just a thought.
I'm on Rev 1 of the Revshift 80a - love them with RE rubber trans mounts, but I'm on a manual transmission. If and when those fail, I'll buy the VTT inserts and some Corteco mounts, most likely, and call it a day.
Filippo
Just curious why you'd run driver side only? I took measurements on stock motor mounts on my car around 30k miles (most of those at stock HP) and the passenger side mount was collapsed - total junk. The driver side motor mount looked pretty good. The problem child is on the compression side of the motor. And if you are running the $10,000,000 iS mount then I'd be concerned about not having to spend $10,000,000 each time that mount takes a crap. In the N54 case, whether you know it or not (i.e. take your factory mounts out and measure them), the passenger-side mount is getting destroyed. I suspect it is a fatigue failure caused by rate of change and/or extent of compression and extension. Seems like these would limit those factors.
I'm guessing the inserts may limit compression and expansion material abuse and prolong the life of the motor mounts. If you are running stock Corteco mounts, they are cheap and who cares (that is, buy them primarily for performance reasons). But if you are running the cubic zirconia iS mounts, getting longevity out of your depreciating asset might be a bigger reason for considering this setup. Just a thought.
I'm on Rev 1 of the Revshift 80a - love them with RE rubber trans mounts, but I'm on a manual transmission. If and when those fail, I'll buy the VTT inserts and some Corteco mounts, most likely, and call it a day.
Filippo
I am not made of money and don't want to bring back the horrible NVH I've experienced by "ruining" an 'iS mount.
Clearly Michael has not owned an N54 long enough ....Nor do I want to waste my time ($) having to do this again relatively quickly.
@Chris@VargasTurboTech would you agree the inserts can be removed and even reinstalled again if someone got a new mount?
Just wanted to update that Im still running these and still very happy with them. I tried lowering the idle rpm but that is a no go.
Did anyone ever try the IS-mounts in combination with these?
Whew! Finally got engine mounts changed.
I got the VTT inserts installed on the Cortego (OE mount) for driver side.
View attachment 42685
Unfortunately I wasn't able to get the 'iS mount to use the inserts. While the driver side was easy to push on and then hammer on... the 'iS mount did not want to fit at _all_.... Being so expensive I didn't wail on it, but took measurements.
View attachment 42686
View attachment 42687View attachment 42690
View attachment 42688View attachment 42689
I can't wait to drive it tomorrow!
So the rubber used with the IS mount is larger? Did you consider removing some of the rubber?