Miles > kms please
Farenheit > Celcius![]()
Sometimes it is hart to distinguish if serious or trolling
Miles > kms please
Farenheit > Celcius![]()
Is @SlowE93 ever serious.Sometimes it is hart to distinguish if serious or trolling![]()
I think you confused your < and >F > C
and
Mph > kph
Fuckn Canadians
Maple Syrup anyone ?Fuckn Canadians![]()
I'll take two liters pleaseMaple Syrup anyone ?
I'll take some, eh buddy!Maple Syrup anyone ?
Maple Syrup anyone ?
Plz don't encourage himI'll take some, eh buddy!
I wish I could just get these two clutch same time and have a real time test. Watched a lot of reviews and videos about them, but it's still some kind of metaphysical hit or miss situation for me.For me personally I thought the apec 3+ had alot of a rougher engagement and a harder to get going smooth in first. My spec twin disk is so much more forgiving in that area for me
x clutch twin organic comes with rigid hubs IIRC, while spec3+ is sprung hub. I believe this may help with the initial clutch engagement, though the surface of spec3+ is more of a metallic type. But anyway, I have no real time experience but online review watching and imagination. Hopefully the spec 3+ works for me as I put my bet on itI've driven my friends 335i with a spec stage 3+, compared to my X clutch organic twin disk his car was easier to leave of the line with. Maybe it's just cause i have 700ish Km's on my clutch. The biggest change for me was how high the cutch engages, made it a little awkward to drive.
You won't be disappointed its a solid clutch that many people useI wish I could just get these two clutch same time and have a real time test. Watched a lot of reviews and videos about them, but it's still some kind of metaphysical hit or miss situation for me.
x clutch twin organic comes with rigid hubs IIRC, while spec3+ is sprung hub. I believe this may help with the initial clutch engagement, though the surface of spec3+ is more of a metallic type. But anyway, I have no real time experience but online review watching and imagination. Hopefully the spec 3+ works for me as I put my bet on it![]()
Aye mate Your forgetting poutine.
About the only good that comes outta that place![]()
I'll take two liters please
I got the maple syrup plug, i'll have him send some out.I'll take some, eh buddy!
From what i heard my clutch should get a lot easier with time. Although i may be swapping to ceramic disks as intentions with my car have changed. My cars been broken for a long time now lol i don't exactly remember how bad it was at the end.I wish I could just get these two clutch same time and have a real time test. Watched a lot of reviews and videos about them, but it's still some kind of metaphysical hit or miss situation for me.
x clutch twin organic comes with rigid hubs IIRC, while spec3+ is sprung hub. I believe this may help with the initial clutch engagement, though the surface of spec3+ is more of a metallic type. But anyway, I have no real time experience but online review watching and imagination. Hopefully the spec 3+ works for me as I put my bet on it![]()
Gentle launches? It makes enough power it'll back half 95% of cars here.Those organic disks should get you to your goals. Organic disks just don't like being launched alot
As long as you dont launch at 6500 like I do I don't see any issues. My spec 3+ wasn't a fan of them type of launchesGentle launches? It makes enough power it'll back half 95% of cars here.
So you like to party. I'm talking 3k maybeAs long as you dont launch at 6500 like I do I don't see any issues. My spec 3+ wasn't a fan of them type of launches
Ohhh yeah all day. My 68 likes to party was never into partys like that before I got that turboSo you like to party. I'm talking 3k maybe
Is V8bait still tuning these or do you know anyone who is pushing these numbers as well with a different tuner, because as far as ive seen people/ other tuners are have trouble making good numbers with 93oct.... or e85 for that matter any recommendations would be nice and if you got any dynos with new tunes from different people?I had a chance to get my car on the Dyno today with the new RB GF turbos and am extremely pleased with the results! All pulls were done on a dynojet in 4th gear. Also these are not glory pulls and should be easy results to replicate.
93 octane @ 18-19psi - 516whp
93 octane @ 25psi- 582 whp
E85- @ 27psi- 681whp
View attachment 31761
View attachment 31762
Mods:
RB GF 19t turbos
RB inlets/ RB outlets
@V8bait tuned MHD flash only
PI intake manifold w/52lb injectors
BMP stage 3 pump
Injen intake
Helix intercooler
Spec stage 2+ clutch
Iβm not specifically talking about RB GFs but most high whp twin setups are tuned by v8bait, Iβve read about him getting logs from people on twin tunes from other tuners, just to beat there numbers after they stated thatβs all they will make on 93. not gonna say names but Iβve had friends that have been through a few tuners on twins with dyno sheets and not all tuners are equal in quality or twin tuning for that matter. Iβd be curious to get some input of peoples tunes on 93 with dyno sheets I already have an idea but If anyone knows for sure who can tune with quality like v8bait and get the numbers out Iβd love to hear about it.Where are you seeing other results from the RB GFs? I know Rob did limitd runs of them so not too many out there and most people don't seem to be posting.
Those are good numbers but please don't classify that as a "93 octane tune." You have both meth and MMT - even if using just the meth for supplemental fueling, it provides a cooling benefit, and the MMT in boostane ups the octane to a good bit over 93 - probably closer to 100 octane.New guy here. Been lurking around the forum for a long while... Years actually...
Last week I dyno'd my car at 595 rwhp on 93 and CP meth. I also blend a can of boostane with each fillup, just to be safe. It's a 2010 135i with auto tranny. I have GC 2.0 turbos. The boost peaks at about 29 psi and tapers to 25 near redline with 9 degrees timing. No timing drops. DocVu street tuned the car.
Regards,
Eric