Wouldn't you need an ultrasonic cleaner to actually clean one of these metal filters correctly? Have fun using your wife's jewelry cleaner. Also, with stainless filters, there is a chance of either a few drops of the cleaning solvent remaining (deadly to engine lube) or that small particles that do not wash out during cleaning can get dislodged and make a pass through the engine(this is not what you want and why the filter exists in the 1st place).
Everything I find shows even F1 cars (highest tolerances and abuse) using paper or synthetics.
Paper filters are vastly preferred by race teams because stainless filters do not capture water, but paper filters do catch water. Water is the number one engine lube problem and always condenses into the oil as it cools down and from storage. The issues with water vapor condensing are much harder on an engine. Paper filters should be changed at every oil change, not because of solid debris, but because of the collected water that they absorb.
Oil analysis of paper vs. metal filters would be interesting. But probably too many variables in a consumer driven car, unless you started with 2 brand new engines and kept the test very very controlled.
I feel like this is a solution to a problem that does not exist. It's like an oil cooler oil cap. Marketing BS no one needs.
If these really were better than paper, which as far as I know every automobile manufacturer uses from the factory, why wouldn't they change the a metal filter and advertise no filter changes. BMW loves the long oil change intervals this would feed into their marketing perfectly. You have to believe BMW and every auto manufacturer has already looked into these and I highly doubt the reason is to sell you one $5 oil filer a year.
You should design and sell light weight crank pulleys for the N54. You know, free up some HP
HP is so easy to make on these engines no one should be looking for 5whp anywhere.