In all fairness, my car felt faster on corner exit than the 700Z. Sure there is some turbo lag to deal with, where there is none in the Z, but the midrange torque makes up for it. A cammed LS7 usually opens up >4800 rpm, whereas on mine all hell breaks loose >3500. And when you consider that both setups make similar power and weigh more or less the same, and that it take a pretty "nasty" LS to get to high 6xx PS naturally aspirated, I didn't feel like I was missing out on anything. The choppy idle and lumpy low-rpm behavior get old real quick on a DD, as does the abysmal fuel economy. Sure it sounds fantastic, but (I am told) so does my car... Engine swaps are non-trivial undertakings (if you want to end up with a "nice" car at least) and should only be attempted if the existing motor is a dog, which is definitely not the case here. In other words, I wouldn't swap out a sophisticated, lightweight, dual-VVT turbo I6 to put in a
Naturally Aspirated V8 - sophisticated or otherwise. Now an LS9 or LT4/5 on the other hand...
PS - Bryan, only "stock" LS7s drop exhaust valves, not 12.7:1 compression race motors destined for competition use
260psi cranking compression anyone?