is the electric pump you're running a scavenger pump? If so, it won't hurt it to run it dry.
Accusump question: can you position it after the oil cooler and before the return? Is anyone running dual coolers? (Besides the cooler off of the scavenging pump)
Would a thinner oil help starvation at all? Considering it should be able to flow easier at temp back to the pan. That combined with a modified VAC baffle and an extra qt of oil maybe.
Can you further weld the edges of the baffle to the pan, closer towards the flat section? That would trap the some of the oil from sloshing in that direction when braking/turning and would still be able to flow back into the pan through the hole and sides.
Just thinking of other ways besides adding an accusump for others with this issue.
View attachment 33002
I'm not sure that's true. They should in theory all flow at a different rate, the thinner being faster which makes perfect logical sense right? For sake of argument I just quickly looked up redline oils:Once up to temperature, the difference in oil weights is negligible. 200f oil basically has the same viscosity as water. Viscosity is important for bearing clearances as small as .001" but no so important for flowing through a 1" wide oil return passage in the cylinder head.
I'm not sure that's true. They should in theory all flow at a different rate, the thinner being faster which makes perfect logical sense right? For sake of argument I just quickly looked up redline oils:
0w20 viscosity @ 100°C/212°F, CSt - 9.1
0w30 viscosity @ 100°C/212°F, CSt - 11.7
0w40 viscosity @ 100°C/212°F, CSt - 15.4
And CSt stands for Centistokes, where water is 1.0038 @ 20°C (just googled it) for comparison. It might not make a big difference, but getting maybe an extra 0.25-0.5 qt faster to the pan might help that second of starvation where it sloshes forward too far. However I'm just throwing ideas/theories and there's no way to test it really aside from logging pressure and running the exact same track, speed, and braking conditions I suppose.
Fair enough, I see your point. I thought I read that 40wt oils were too thick for our (N54) tight bearing clearances anyway? I can try to find the article/thread. I recently saw one Pennzoil 0w30 oil that had a viscosity index of over 200 - which is NUTS for an off the shelf oil, it also had the Porsche C30 & VW 504/507 which has super strict requirements similar to LL01/LL04 but is a low SAPS oil. Would be fine for short drain intervals though.I definitely know what you're saying. I have said similar things myself. But it's just not realistic. I think you missed my point a bit. Of course "thinner" flows faster. That is what kinematic viscosity is a measurement of lol... how quickly oil flows through a tube. Not denying that.
People think of oil as being "thick" because they usually see/pour it at room temperature where the viscosity is closer to 200cSt+. At temperature, 15cSt might as well be water. 9cSt vs 15cSt isn't really going to make a lick of difference in regard to this discussion. This issue is still g-force and roll angle. whether the oil is thick or thin it's going to be returning to the front of the pan when you are braking turning etc. It's just an inherent issue with a wet sump.
Further, you can't really run a 20wt oil as it doesn't have the dynamic viscosity needed to support bearing loads. Need at least a dynamic viscosity of 3.5cP. So, you're basically saying what if you ran a 30wt vs a 40wt and quite frankly just about every LL-01 40wt oil is already on the thin side and might as well be called a 30wt.
Fair enough, I see your point. I thought I read that 40wt oils were too thick for our (N54) tight bearing clearances anyway? I can try to find the article/thread. I recently saw one Pennzoil 0w30 oil that had a viscosity index of over 200 - which is NUTS for an off the shelf oil, it also had the Porsche C30 & VW 504/507 which has super strict requirements similar to LL01/LL04 but is a low SAPS oil. Would be fine for short drain intervals though.
Would a thinner oil help starvation at all? Considering it should be able to flow easier at temp back to the pan. That combined with a modified VAC baffle and an extra qt of oil maybe.
Can you further weld the edges of the baffle to the pan, closer towards the flat section? That would trap the some of the oil from sloshing in that direction when braking/turning and would still be able to flow back into the pan through the hole and sides.
Just thinking of other ways besides adding an accusump for others with this issue.
View attachment 33002
Finally got a chance to test the reversed pump on track, and the oil pressure still drops from 95psi to around 50-60psi when trail braking into a left hand hair pin running AD08R tires. The only change I noticed is that the oil temperature fluctuates a lot more now, as the sensor gets a bucket of cooled oil every time I brake lol
Three questions
1) Should I be concerned? When pressure dips, it is still above idle oil pressure. At least according to the analogue gauge which may have a delay.
2) Given that an accusump runs at 55-60psi, would it even help in my case?
3) Is there consensus that I should have the pan re-welded as suggested above?
So I have decided to do the following as a final attempt to try and solve this issue without getting into accusumps
1) Do the welding as suggested by @gmagnus7
2) Modify / make a new oil inlet that delivers oil inside the baffle instead of where it is now next to the oil temperature sensor
View attachment 33336
Let us know how it goes! Glad you thought it might be a good idea. Hopefully doesn't make your engine explode
Hello, I should welcome myself to dead N55 club
The first time on track with 235/35/18 R888R's not sure if oil starvation caused overheating or just overheated.