M8x1.25x30 12.9 gradeA customer ordered at a shop by me in Germany he doesn’t want it now but the bolts have gone walkies . I’m fittion on mine but no screws.
M8x1.25x30 12.9 gradeA customer ordered at a shop by me in Germany he doesn’t want it now but the bolts have gone walkies . I’m fittion on mine but no screws.
My question is why does it fully encapsulate the bolt when it doesn't go under any kinda of stress aside harsh vibration? Wouldn't a metal disc work just as well, and also give you access to the bolt for use while walnut blasting?
It's to prevent the bolt backing out and losing pressure on the sprocket
It's a good piece of mind. Here's mine Tony made for me for the ATi dampner.
Curious if the intersection of those smaller circles to the larger may be stress risers.It's a good piece of mind. Here's mine Tony made for me for the ATi dampner.
Interesting observation. Looks to me that could be a weak point in the design.Curious if the intersection of those smaller circles to the larger may be stress risers.
View attachment 29204
Filippo
I understand it's purpose, older BMW's use a nut instead that owners often locked with wire to prevent backing out.
That's more like it, I feel that design is actually superior. The user can use the crank bolt for maintenance without worrying about loosening that oh so essential bolt.
They absolutely are. The smaller a radius, the higher the stress concentration. Now whether or not the stress level this part may see exceeds its capability is a whole other story.Curious if the intersection of those smaller circles to the larger may be stress risers.
View attachment 29204
Filippo
Well obviously the greater contact area you can have between the bolt and the capture, the better you can distribute any forces of the bolt trying to rotate and hopefully the less chance of that happening. At the expense of preventing maintenance where you may want to be rotating the crank by hand but you can bump it with the starter.