With a standard check valve you are applying full plenum vacuum to the crankcase which is not good idea. You need a PCV Valve if you are going to use your plenum as a vacuum reference, they are specifically calibrated to limit flow through the valve at high vacuums (ie. decel, idle, etc).
Then deleting the flapper means you have reduced the level of vacuum on the crankcase (as you eliminated the restriction which elevates the vacuum in small PCV flow scenarios) but this isn't a good thing. Basically what you have going on is a big unneeded vacuum leak at this moment, and an overwhelming amount of airflow going through your crankcase under low load conditions.
Also this would not show on WGDC as WGDC represents BOOST, and when in BOOST these valves close (thus seal themselves from any functionality) as the system is operating in HIGH load (ie. forced ventilation out of flapper port only).
Rob
When I originally asked if this way was gonna work I was given the green light by a bunch of others that my plot was perfect. I'm finding out now it's much less than perfect lol..
I think it would be much better off with way smaller line on the vacuum side. For now I'm gonna add a restriction at the catch can. I have a piece of hose that fits into one of the male orb fittings then can't get pulled out from the push Lok fitting over it.
It's way less than perfect and I'll adapt it as time goes on..
Thanks for the input it's appreciated
What would be a good inline check valve to use in my situation?