sizing.....absolutely no meaningful correlation... whatsoever given the context for why people think they need a stiffer one.
hee hee (I'll stop this, immediately btw)
sizing.....absolutely no meaningful correlation... whatsoever given the context for why people think they need a stiffer one.
And to be sure, I could change back to the white 8psi spring to double check of my max boost goes back down, but as some of you know changing the springs are a PITA.
I'm pretty sure that hasn't worked. Maybe we are not smacking hard enough.Also keep in mind that, like me, BOV's sometimes need ... A smack to make them work properly.
What? I don't see that anywhere on Tial's page.Welll…. you will get some pressure drop from the bend and through even an open throttle body. But we're in agreement, it ain't a lot.
Here’s another question:
What’s better - a BOV that opens faster, or closes faster?
Comment: Softer springs like the black (6 psi) and white (8 psi) should open faster to a -11 psi or -12 psi manifold vacuum pressure upon throttle closure than would a plain spring (10 psi) or yellow spring (11 psi).
Accordingly the softer springs should release boost pressure faster than the stronger springs. In contrast, the stronger springs should close the BOV faster once the throttle plate opens, thereby increasing responsiveness.
So, what’s better?
I believe this is a malformed question. Hear me out. The question presupposes the relationship of the spring to two consequences. Ideally we want a spring that releases boost pressure as quickly as possible when the throttle is released, and at the same time, we'd like a BOV which does not impede the building of boost pressure in the intake tract when throttle is applied and we are seeking to move from vacuum to boost. The spring itself is not the only factor. For example, one has the ability to shim the spring.Accordingly the softer springs should release boost pressure faster than the stronger springs. In contrast, the stronger springs should close the BOV faster once the throttle plate opens, thereby increasing responsiveness.
So, what’s better?
Your saying that it responded so fast that it ws scary or was the problem a delay where turbos spooled and then the bov closed afterwards creating a light switch effect?I believe this is a malformed question. Hear me out. The question presupposes the relationship of the spring to two consequences. Ideally we want a spring that releases boost pressure as quickly as possible when the throttle is released, and at the same time, we'd like a BOV which does not impede the building of boost pressure in the intake tract when throttle is applied and we are seeking to move from vacuum to boost. The spring itself is not the only factor. For example, one has the ability to shim the spring.
The second factor, at least in my very myopic experience - my car seems to transition from vacuum to boost very quickly. Could it be quicker? I suppose that's possible of course. On the other hand, with the stock Q spring my car was absolutely scary in certain transient throttle situations at significant to full boost. So I would say in my experience, there is a possibly nominal improvement (fast transient from vacuum to boost) versus a significantly scary-as-shit factor with the bigger spring at the other end of the problem.
I suppose that would lead me to say, along @doublespaces and @Chris@VargasTurboTech observations - run the lighter spring and shim as desired.
Filippo
Delay in response was my issue, I believe.Your saying that it responded so fast that it ws scary or was the problem a delay where turbos spooled and then the bov closed afterwards creating a light switch effect?
Basically ruining any granular control is what I was meaning by light switch.
That's interesting I would have thought heavier spring would help response but just risk turbine damage. The only thing I could imagine is that if the bov is open longer it could possibly allow the turbos to spin up freely before getting resistance and building boost but idk. With stock I would be under vac at low loads but with the hydras you will be pleased cause cruising down highway I name 2 to 3 psi in fact I was getting limps cause of over boost we had to reduce wgdc alot cause they just are always moving air. Makes Me wonder if I should gone with the 800s but then idk i think without the cams or head work the 650s are better than stock in every way.Delay in response was my issue, I believe.
Filippo
That's interesting I would have thought heavier spring would help response but just risk turbine damage. The only thing I could imagine is that if the bov is open longer it could possibly allow the turbos to spin up freely before getting resistance and building boost but idk. With stock I would be under vac at low loads but with the hydras you will be pleased cause cruising down highway I name 2 to 3 psi in fact I was getting limps cause of over boost we had to reduce wgdc alot cause they just are always moving air. Makes Me wonder if I should gone with the 800s but then idk i think without the cams or head work the 650s are better than stock in every way.
Yeah I'm doing a crappy job at communicating actually. I had several throttle problems, not one as I said. The other was jerky on-throttle behavior, some times. So that ... and off throttle delay. Both those issues disappeared with the spring change and 1/4" barb to the BOV.That's interesting I would have thought heavier spring would help response but just risk turbine damage. akes Me wonder if I should gone with the 800s but then idk i think without the cams or head work the 650s are better than stock in every way.