I'm done here. ALL the photos are sent are from Brazil passed to me by either the user or the mechanic of the user.
I wasnt talking about the video, I only replied about my photos being stolen! Furthermore I really wasnt planning on digging through the rest of the thread to prove that this thread to be even more false, but after my last post and your continued ignorance claiming the photos are real I free'd up some of my spare time to watch the video and look for even more flaws in your argument especially since VTT takes care of their customers on a case by case customers basis, so I'll have to wrap this thread up like this.
First,
YOU claimed to have proof to backup what ROB post about when he started this thread.
At any rate as the customer does not speak english, a companion who does posted about the failure online. While obviously frustrated from all the failures, he was looking for a resolve in light of a "new Mar-M" turbine on the horizon that is a supposed "advancement only". However this online disclosure did not go over well with VTT- literally to the point of declining further warrantable considerations.
Then just as that was not enough, the forum rep attempts to further mask the issue by pretending the CURRENT FAILED turbos are really GC 1.0's, which they clearly are not even by the writings of the actual owner (his boss) of VTT. Censored link here:
https://bmw.spoolstreet.com/threads/all-vtt-v2-gc-turbos-move-to-mar-m246-turbine-wheels.4418/
The video you posted doesnt backup robs claim that these are 2.0 failures, but instead
the video clearly shows a failure of GC 1.0 turbos NOT GC 2.0 turbos in a repaired 1.0 housing like you or the email to Tony claimed in this thread.
Now if you read Tony's email you can clearly see a miss communication on his with the way he wrote it. When Tony said, "This is his first set of V2 GC's, not 3rd" was tony actually refering to the set that he'll get in returned to him, because if a set of V2's failed he would have said this will be his second set of V2's
Also the next statement that says, "these units are V2 CHRA in V1 housings" was again him explaining what the repair will be, which is GC 2.0 CHRA's in your 1.0 casing. Obviously Tony should have added a few more words to be clearer to prevent multiple interpretations, but
until you or someone else posts photos/videos of repaired 2.0 turbos that failed in 1.0 housings (which is your and your buddy's claim against Tony) your argument is therefore false until you properly prove your argument, which at this point I cant see happening.
You should take your own advice and walk away from this thread, better yet walk away from this forum because its pretty obviuos you only want to delibertly continue to spit out false information by
still claiming the photos you posted are your buddy's photos from Brazil when I clearly poved that those photos were stolen from my thread and you tried to pass them on as your own.
I'm done here. ALL the photos are sent are from Brazil passed to me by either the user or the mechanic of the user.
bmw.spoolstreet.com
