So we just stick with drive-by, third-hand commentaries, publicly trashing vendor products instead of asking people to back up claims? Ouch. What a strange and dysfunctional community this is. And to actually get that logic from vendor is baffling.
The OP could have simply started this thread with the subject he had in mind, which was to ask about RB turbos. Taking a swipe and another vendors product along the way distracted from what he was trying to achieve, that is if what he was trying to achieve was to ask about RB turbos instead of spreading FUD about a product of MMP.
Filippo
Filippo,
Yes we believe you are correct most of the time. In fact over the past 8 years selling turbochargers to this community we have had some issues as well, and guess what we have mostly trolling us for literally years thereafter? You've guessed it, those same "drive-by, third-hand commentaries, publicly trashing vendor products instead of asking people to back up claims." Very seldom is it actually one we have dealt with and for sure the 3rd parties are the ones that typically do the ranting online. However this doesn't mean they aren't entirely correct about "issues".
These things can haunt you for an insane amount of time when you get the parroting effect into full swing and this swing can take years to manifest itself and also many years to reverse once set into motion. 'Tis is the life of turbo business over many years over the internet.
Regarding the baffling vendor logic all we can say is that we have been there, done that, etc.; and we get calls a LOT from frustrated consumers from all walks of turbo vendor life. So unless we are getting pranked from guys (ordering oil drains, pcv systems, looking for 2nd opinions, etc.) hoping for resolves to their issues; then we wouldn't necessarily call some things stated as FUD.
At any rate if you'd wish to start a new thread requesting the specifics surrounding this unrelated discussion (to the thread at hand) then be our guest.
Rob