Guys honestly I don't see a problem with Rob asking those questions. Yes, there has been back and forth bickering between vtt and Rob in the past, but I had the same questions and was one of the first to ask them when the release thread was posted. I didn't ask them out of malice or spite towards any vender. The idea is brilliant, but you do have to provide data ,photos etc to validate a product. You can't just claim it does so and so and broke your test rig without any photos , technical information etc. Some break away torque numbers and photos in the beginning would have clarified alot of these questions and this long thread of back and forth bickering wouldn't have occurred.
I don't think anyones bashing the spline lock. Other venders have released products with claims only to fail later on in real world testing. It is hard to simulate the forces on the hub without the motor actually running. Applying a twisiting force alone on the hub does not simulate what is going on at the hub on a running motor under load. Harmonics , heat cycles, varying forces, and varying sudden loads from the serpentine drive is not accounted for in the model.
From an engineering standpoint this is way better than the stock setup when coupled with the bolt capture, no doubt about that. Its also easier to install , which is a plus. Just some critical info was left out on the product release that left questions and would leave questions to anyone who has a background in engineering. Props to vtt for coming up with this. To Rob's statement about the splines working if they were straight, it would work with straight teeth as well given how the crank is being dug into when applying this. There are numerous interference fit applications using straight cut teeth to acheive locking when applying a twisiting force to 2 parts. It sucks I missed out on the Black Friday deal ...... Had a ton of work the past month, cars been on the back burner.
I don't think anyones bashing the spline lock. Other venders have released products with claims only to fail later on in real world testing. It is hard to simulate the forces on the hub without the motor actually running. Applying a twisiting force alone on the hub does not simulate what is going on at the hub on a running motor under load. Harmonics , heat cycles, varying forces, and varying sudden loads from the serpentine drive is not accounted for in the model.
From an engineering standpoint this is way better than the stock setup when coupled with the bolt capture, no doubt about that. Its also easier to install , which is a plus. Just some critical info was left out on the product release that left questions and would leave questions to anyone who has a background in engineering. Props to vtt for coming up with this. To Rob's statement about the splines working if they were straight, it would work with straight teeth as well given how the crank is being dug into when applying this. There are numerous interference fit applications using straight cut teeth to acheive locking when applying a twisiting force to 2 parts. It sucks I missed out on the Black Friday deal ...... Had a ton of work the past month, cars been on the back burner.