Post up a 10 second car with MHD only and better boost logs to back that claim please.
In MHD's defense, my car definitely would have ran the same on the boostbox. When I had it up and running it controlled boost well, I just saw some weird electrical issues with it. The eboost I have on the car now is probably the "worst" of the 3 major ST boost control options from a safety standpoint, I just like how easy it is to change target and still allows the ECU to be in control of every other signal (even boost via throttle closure when needed). Once MHD adds switchable targets to boostbox integration I'll probably switch back over.
Personally I would never NLS my car without an ignition cut. Sure it works but is putting unnecessary stress on literally everything lol
Any NLS is putting more stress on the drivetrain, sure. I think the most beneficial thing is have something that can take up *some* of the instantaneous torque spike for an NLS (in my case, xclutch organic that slips a hair on an NLS). No matter how the NLS is accomplished, a instantaneous transition from negative torque to high positive torque is always going to occur, it just needs to be manageable. That's why once MHD gets some fancy NLS logic (initiate the fuel reinstatement with some degree of spark retard, then ramp it back in) it will save drivelines and improve times at the track
Sorry for getting off topic
@suspenceful lol
