I'm assuming those numbers were hit with a PI system with a stage 3 lpfp?
Indeed, PI and upgraded LPFP would be required to achieve the maximum result.
Kind regards,
Marshall T. Lee | Founder of ML Performance
I'm assuming those numbers were hit with a PI system with a stage 3 lpfp?
Feel like I'm beating a dead horse here but were there any dyno graphs from your R&D vehicle? You keep saying you will have that info in April. I see you said your R&D car made 600bhp, care to provide the proof. So did you guys only R&D fitment at this point and not the functionality or potential? I'm kinda at a loss here in your timeline and sequence of events to bringing these to market.
Is it true that these turbo's were engineered solely by NOZ Turbo and are manufactured by CHSH Turbo (Taiwan)? ML Performance you mentioned previously you do all the machining for the CHRA in-house. Something is not adding up here...
From where I'm sitting, the only agenda I can see is that it appears you are trying to pass off someone else's hard work as your own.
Are you sure the story you want to run with is that another competing company just happened to design the exact same machined CHRA ball bearing turbo's at the same time as you? If that's the case, it should be pretty simple to provide some sort of evidence showing that these are indeed your own design so you can put these malicious rumours to bed, no?
If the specs are actually different, how are they different?
Both use German ball bearings, offer a 1 year warranty & both "new products" were announced within 12 hours of each other on different forums, but only 1 provided solid models & was transparent about their origin.
Amazingly similar for being continents away...
View attachment 3299
Dear,@ML Performance UK Did you customer ever finish their project and put down some numbers? A ball bearing upgrade would be pretty fantastic. It's definitely more about the drive-ability.
He was trying to sell something he didn't own.
It backfired.